Living with Proposition 65: Preventative Measures & Defending Against a 60-Day Notice

Living with Proposition 65: Preventative Measures & Defending Against a 60-Day Notice

Presented: October 18, 2010

Published: Monday, October 18, 2010

As much as 30% of the national sales of dietary supplements may be to California consumers - but companies that market in that state may encounter high penalties for non-compliance with a California law known as Proposition 65. The focus of this law for the supplement class has been on the warnings required for products that may inadvertently contain small amounts of heavy metals, such as arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, and especially lead. As of October 2010, over 100 companies in the supplement & sports nutrition categories have received 60-day notices alleging the presence of lead (and in some cases arsenic) above the very low level allowed under Proposition 65 and failure to provide required warnings. Learn what your company can do to protect itself from a Proposition 65 complaint. And if you have already received a 60-day notice, learn what your options are at this point.

  • Proposition 65 - the basics.
  • Options to protect your company.
  • What to do if you have received a 60-day notice.
  • Q&A: Obtain answers to your questions about Proposition 65
Take advantage of the expertise of these speakers:
  • Melissa Jones, Esq, Greenberg Traurig
  • Stan Landfair, Esq, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, LLP
  • Trent Norris, Esq, Arnold, Porter, LLP
  • Michael McGuffin, AHPA
Materials in this packet include:
  • Presentation files from the webinar
  • An unedited transcript of the AHPA event
  • Audio file
Member Price: $220.00
Non-Member Price: $520.00


2021 Annual Fund Sponsors


AHPA appreciates the support of its sponsors, but does not endorse, recommend, or provide a warranty for any sponsor company, its products or services. AHPA has no responsibility for any transaction entered into with any of these companies.